Recent Deals
SecurityFirst Deal
TalentGuard Opportunity
DataVision Solutions
SecurityFirst Deal / Spaces
Ava can make mistakes. Please check important information.
AI-Generated Sales Assets
Accelerators
Competitive Battlecard
Updated Nov 20
Account Research
Updated Nov 18
Value Case
Updated Jul 20
Competitive Battlecard: SecurityFirst vs. TalentGuard

Competitive Overview

You're competing against SecurityFirst and TalentGuard. Here's how ZeroShield differentiates:

SecurityFirst
  • Industry leader (15+ years)
  • Advanced threat detection
  • 24-48hr onboarding delays
  • Poor HR integration
TalentGuard
  • HR-first design
  • Fast onboarding (2 hours)
  • Basic threat detection
  • Requires add-on security
🛡️ ZeroShield
  • Adaptive trust framework
  • Instant progressive access
  • Unified platform
  • Predictive risk intelligence

Feature Comparison

CapabilitySecurityFirstTalentGuardZeroShield
Onboarding24-48hrs2 hoursInstant
HR IntegrationLimitedNativeNative + 500+ APIs
Threat DetectionAdvancedBasicAI-powered
Pricing$45-75/mo$25-50/mo$35-60/mo

Objection Handling

"SecurityFirst has better security"

SecurityFirst has deep threat detection built over 15 years. However, most security incidents stem from identity issues during onboarding/offboarding—where SecurityFirst's 24-48hr provisioning creates risk gaps. ZeroShield provides continuous security through adaptive trust while eliminating manual delays.

"TalentGuard is simpler and HR-friendly"

TalentGuard excels at HR-driven access. Where ZeroShield differentiates is depth. When you need advanced threat detection or zero-trust architecture, you'll layer on additional security tools. ZeroShield gives you that unified experience—HR-friendly and security-grade—without the integration tax.